• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Brendon Marotta

  • Work
  • Blog
  • Show
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Blog

The Cultural Trauma of Circumcision

February 18, 2022 By Brendon Marotta

When the trauma of circumcision is acknowledged, it is usually framed in terms of the initial pain the child experiences. Circumcision causes trauma. Studies have shown that this trauma alters brain development creates a lasting change in behavior. Entire books have been written about this trauma, and I cover it in my own documentary on the issue of circumcision, American Circumcision.

This trauma is serious. Yet there is another less understood form of trauma that survivors experience once they have become aware of the harm of circumcision. This trauma is the cultural trauma that survivors experience from living in a genital cutting culture.

Cultural trauma is understood and acknowledged on other social issues. For example, racial justice activists use the term racial trauma or race-based traumatic stress to describe the trauma they experience from racism or interacting with a systemically racist culture. To illustrate this concept, imagine a black man walking alone at night when a police car pulls up slowly alongside him. The moment he sees that police car, the man might become tense or afraid. This fear is due to the cultural knowledge of black men’s experiences with police. Even if in this particular the police officer would be nice or doesn’t even see him, the man might still experience stress due to the culture itself. Racial justice activists suggest that these repeated experiences can add up to a form of complex post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) which they call race-based traumatic stress (RBTS).

Most men I know who are aware of the harm of circumcision also have repeated stressful experiences around the issue. They are used to having their feelings invalidated when they speak about being sexually assaulted as children. They might have lost friends or family for speaking up. They have endured fragile outbursts from perpetrators when they bring awareness to the harm of circumcision. They have endured repeated body-shaming both for what they have and the body part they lost due to circumcision. They are regularly exposed to cultural propaganda telling them that the abuse inflicted on them as children is normal and that they are somehow better for it. These repeated experiences can also add up to a form of complex PTSD due to the trauma of living in a genital cutting culture.

What are some examples of this cultural trauma?

Stress around potential victims. Many survivors report becoming tense when they see pregnant women. Whereas most people experience happiness for the new life coming into the world, survivors of genital cutting perceive a potential threat to that child’s safety if they are male in a culture that normalizes male genital cutting.

Stress around family. Many survivors report becoming estranged from their family after speaking out about circumcision or questioning their parents about it. This is very similar to the familial homophobia many gay activists have written about, yet there is no word for this among survivors of genital cutting and the added component that the people they would most want support and comfort from are also perpetrators.

Stress around medical perpetrators. Many survivors avoid doctor’s visits because they do not want to be around or give money to people engaged in abusing children the way they were abused. This means when survivors do need medical care, they must choose between their psychological and emotional safety and their health.

Stress around their child’s medical needs. Some survivors also avoid bringing their children to the doctor due to the fact doctors often sexually assault intact children by forcibly retracting their foreskin. (One survey showed that 43% of intact boys have been forcibly retracted, often by a doctor.) Survivors often have to risk their child being sexually assaulted to get him medical care.

Stress around birth. Hospitals solicit for circumcision an average of eight times per mother. Hospitals have also circumcised children without parental consent. Many parents aware of circumcision report being tense and hypervigilant in hospital birth settings and watching their new baby like a hawk to ensure no harm comes to him. Even if home birthing, the possibility of any need for medical help carries with it the possibility of perpetrators entering the sacred space of the birth of their child.

Stress around sexuality. Every time a circumcised man sees his body, there is a visible scar that can remind him of his own abuse. He might feel pain during sex or erections. There might be ongoing harm due to circumcision complications. There can also be stress in relationships, especially if the survivor’s partner(s) do not understand his feelings.

Stress around media. Media often reinforces dominant narratives about genital cutting being somehow “better” or “beneficial.” Seeing media that portrays their feelings of survivors as invalid can be triggering. Even seeing the male body in media can remind survivors either of what they do not have or what is normalized in genital cutting cultures.

Stress around Jewish perpetrators. Evening mentioning this source of trauma can provoke fragility and abuse from Jewish perpetrators. Jewish perpetrators often frame survivors’ trauma and resulting feelings as “antisemitism” and use that discourse as a justification to harm and target survivors for speaking about sexual assault they endured as children. Some survivors feel rightfully tense around Jewish people because they have experienced or know they might experience harassment and abuse from Jewish people if they share their testimony. Others feel tension for the same reason any survivor might feel tension around a perpetrator.

Stress around Jewish victims. Other survivors feel tense around Jewish people for the same reason they feel tense around new mothers. They know that children born into Jewish homes risk enduring the same abuse they endured as children. Seeing potential victims or other people they know are survivors reminds them of their own trauma, even if those other survivors are in false consciousness about their own abuse.

Stress around sharing feelings. There can be cultural stress if the survivor shares his feelings and they are not seen, heard, or acknowledged by those around him. Many survivors have to be careful about who they share their feelings with due to the ridicule and verbal abuse normalized against men who share their feelings on this issue. This abuse serves the cultural function of protecting the dominant narrative around circumcision so that perpetrators can continue to say “I’ve never heard anyone complain,” since those who do complain are often abused into silence.

Stress around bystanders. In order for a child to be abused, multiple aspects of society must fail to protect him. Survivors often feel stress around any element of society they feel should have protected them from child abuse that did not, especially if that aspect of society engages in or contributes to the abuse. This can include elements of government, religion, or the family.

These are just some examples. Once survivors become more aware of the concept of cultural trauma, I’m certain they will identify more. It is important to name and talk about these traumas because acknowledging them is the first step to changing and healing them.

To learn more, read my book Children’s Justice.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Blog, Children's Justice

What Is Pedophile Fragility?

February 17, 2022 By Brendon Marotta

Pedophile fragility describes the triggered reaction and defensive maneuvers perpetrators of systemic pedophilia engage in when their role in harming children is brought to their awareness.

Originally coined by Robin DiAngelo and popularized in her bestseller White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism to describe white people’s defensive and triggered reaction to discussions of race and racism, the term fragility can also be used to describe any person or groups triggered reaction to having their own role in a harmful system brought to their awareness (ex: brown fragility).

The term pedophile fragility applies the concept of fragility to those who participate in systemic pedophilia, the systems, institutions, and cultural beliefs that harm children. Pedophile fragility is often triggered by discussions of spanking, circumcision, compulsory schooling, or any cultural practice that harms children.

Fragile pedophile-apologists will often engage in defensive triggered reactions to new information that could bring the harm they are engaged in to their awareness. Those with pedophile fragility often frame new information exposing the harm of common cultural practices as a personal referendum on the “goodness” of them as an audience. Common displays of pedophile fragility include framing simply sharing new information as “harassment” or “bashing” other parents.

This is often a form of psychological projection since those same accusers will often engage in harassment themselves. For example, in response to new information on circumcision, many who have participated in this form of systemic pedophilia will engage in body shaming by describing the intact body as gross or unclean or attempt to incite violence against those sharing the information by calling them “nazis” for simply opposing circumcision.

Pedophile fragility can even occur within families. When children approach their parents about what those parents did to them as children, parents often engage in defensive triggered maneuvers to avoid acknowledging the child’s feelings or any wrongdoing they might have done. These can range from excuses (“we did the best we could”) to denial of the child’s experience and feelings (“there is nothing wrong with you”) and even the outright defense of the harm perpetrated (“it was for your own good”).

Pedophile fragility harms survivors of systemic pedophilia. In order for survivors to heal from childhood trauma, they need to recognize and acknowledge their feelings and experiences. It also prevents society from doing the necessary work to protect children. Ensuring the next generation is free from trauma requires dismantling the systems engaged in harming children.

To learn more about this issue, read Children’s Justice.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Blog, Children's Justice

The Rectification of Names In Social Justice

February 14, 2022 By Brendon Marotta

“If language is not correct, then what is said is not what is meant;
if what is said is not what is meant, then what must be done remains undone;
if this remains undone, morals and art will deteriorate;
if justice goes astray, the people will stand about in helpless confusion.
Hence there must be no arbitrariness in what is said.
This matters above everything.”
– Confucius

When asked what the first thing he would do if he achieved power was, the ancient Chinese philosopher Confucius replied that he would give things their proper names. This concept became known as The Rectification of Names and is still employed today by modern political leaders.

The importance of names is a value shared throughout spiritual and philosophical traditions. In the Biblical book of Genesis, Adam’s first act after being given dominion over all of Creation is to name the animals. Many occult traditions believe that to know the name of a thing is to have power over it. The power of names continues today in critical social justice in the form of hermeneutical injustice and power/knowledge.

Hermeneutical injustice is a form of epistemic injustice described by Miranda Fricker in her book Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Hermeneutical injustice is defined as the inability to communicate or understand one’s own experience due to a lack of concepts available to define the experience. In other words, not having the words to describe the injustices you experience is itself an injustice.

The example of hermeneutical injustice Fricker gives in her book is the invention of the term “sexual harassment.” Prior to a court case brought by Carmita Wood, women had no way to articulate the injustice of unwanted sexual advances in the workplace. What was happening to them wasn’t rape, but it also wasn’t nothing. “Sexual harassment” gave them a word to articulate the injustice they were experiencing, creating hermeneutical justice

The concept of hermeneutical injustice implies that there might be injustices we experience today, that we still don’t have names for. As Confucius pointed out, “if language is not correct, then what is said is not what is meant; if what is said is not what is meant, then what must be done remains undone.” Social justice is only possible with the right language, or hermeneutical justice and the Rectification of Names.

Language also creates power. This is what French theorist Michel Foucault articulated when he coined the term power/knowledge. In Foucault’s view, every system of power rests on a system of knowledge or language, which in turn reproduces a system of power. If you control knowledge and language, you can achieve power.

We see the modern application of power/knowledge in social justice itself. Language like “diversity, equity, and inclusion” create knowledge and ways of knowing, which in turn creates power for those who wield it. The control social justice activists have achieved over various parts of society is only possible through a complex knowledge and language system known as critical theory. By rectifying the names and calling some things “racism” or injustice and other things “equity” or justice, critical social justice activists wield power over society and are able to accomplish their moral vision.

By contrast, those who are out of power often lack the language to articulate the injustices they perceive. For example, if you look at the “anti-woke” resistance to critical social justice, they often use the terms “fascist” and “Marxist” interchangeably to describe what they perceive as the totalitarian control of critical social justice. Those terms have different meanings and the problem they face is not exactly either. This is a bit like Carmita Wood describing her experience as “rape” prior to the invention of the term “sexual harassment.” The “anti-woke” face a hermeneutical injustice problem where they lack the language to articulate the issues they face.

At the same time, they also face a power/knowledge problem. Many of the “anti-woke” identify as former leftists. They call for a return to “classical liberalism” or the “original” definition of racism and Civil Rights politics. These ideologies contain the same language as critical social justice will therefore reproduce the same forms of power that gave rise to critical social justice. If the “anti-woke” actually wanted power, they would have to articulate a new system of knowledge and language different from the terms of critical social justice.

The next time you face a problem, see how much simply finding the right name for that problem resolves the issue. To know the name of a thing is to have power over it. This has been true since Biblical times and the time of Confucius all the way to our present day.


Brendon Marotta is the author of Children’s Justice, which gives names to many important social justice issues. Read the book here: https://brendonmarotta.com/childrensjustice/

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Blog, Children's Justice

Why Hasn’t There Been A Social Justice Movement For Children?

February 13, 2022 By Brendon Marotta

Why hasn’t there been a social justice movement for children?

It’s odd when you think about it. If social justice is about protecting the vulnerable, the minority, and the oppressed, then there is no minority more vulnerable or oppressed than children.

It’s also strange when you consider how many other social justice movements exist. There is a social justice movement for every identity group. There is a movement for racial justice, women, gender identity, queer identity, disability justice, fat studies, decolonization, indigenous people, neurodiversity, etc. Why not children?

In Epistemic Injustice: Power and The Ethics of Knowing, Miranda Fricker suggests that “we try hardest to understand those things it serves us to understand,” and “a group’s unequal hermeneutical participation will tend to show up in a localized manner in hermeneutical hotspots.” In other words, people seek knowledge when it benefits them.

If a group is oppressed, they will seek out knowledge to understand their oppression. Critical social justice has a lot of very useful tools for any minority that wants to organize for power. However, dominant groups might not seek the same level of knowledge or understanding when there is nothing for them to gain. How do adults benefit from understanding children?

The obvious answer to why there hasn’t been a social justice movement for children is that it doesn’t benefit adults to have one, and adults are the ones with access to the epistemic tools of social justice and critical theory.

There are vast bodies of knowledge about children. Yet there is very little knowledge for children. When adults do study children, they center their understanding on what benefits adults. Everything from parenting to pedagogy is centered on the question: how do we get children to do what we want?

If all of the literature on another class was centered on the question “how do we get this group to do what we want?” we would assume there was serious exploitation and oppression going on. Yet adults often miss this, because they view children as extensions of themselves or the property of adults rather than whole persons with their own unique needs and way of seeing the world.

Even social justice literature often ignores the needs of children. Most social justice literature is focused on how to use children to meet the needs of adult identity groups. The entire field of critical pedagogy looks at how to educate children in social justice ideas but never questions the compulsory government institutions children are locked in where this teaching occurs.

As far as I know, Children’s Justice is the first book of its kind to envision a social justice movement for children. I wrote it because I was still connected to my own inner child and childhood experiences. I think if anyone looks honestly at their own feelings and experiences as a child, they will see significant injustices, some of which might still affect them to this day.

Since what we do to children affects the adults they become, the issue of how we treat children intersects with every other social justice issue. We won’t have full social justice until we have Children’s Justice.

To learn more, read Children’s Justice.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Blog, Children's Justice

What is Systemic Pedophilia?

February 10, 2022 By Brendon Marotta

Systemic pedophilia describes the beliefs, culture, practices, language, institutions, and other social systems that allow children to be harmed. Systemic pedophilia includes the abuse, rape, and genital cutting of children, and all aspects of society that allow or contribute to these forms of abuse.

– Children’s Justice

What makes an issue systemic? In critical social justice, systemic issues are those caused by the confluence of multiple systems rather than merely individuals. Systemic issues can occur even if those participating them have no conscious desire to harm others or awareness that they are participating in a systemic issue.

Systemic pedophilia is the application of this idea to systems which harm children. Whereas child abuse is often viewed as an individual problem, systemic pedophilia recognizes that the larger cultural beliefs, institutions, and language used around children can contribute to harming them.

Take for example a teacher sexually abusing a student. On one level, this is an individual crime for which only the teacher is responsible. However, the school system hired this teacher and gave him authority over students. In this system, students’ basic bodily functions like going to the bathroom or walking down the hall were at the mercy of adults like this abuser. The child was taught at school that setting boundaries with adults was “talking back to the teacher” and he could be punished for disobeying his abuser. A systemic view reveals that this abuse was only possible due to the larger cultural systems around compulsory schooling and the beliefs and practices this system inflicts on children.

If we were to examine what this child’s parents, media, and the larger culture around this child taught him or how they exercised power over him, we might find ways that other cultural systems were complicit in abuse. There might even be culture-wide assumptions or common forms of language that contribute to abuse or make it more likely.

This systemic view holds not only the individual abuser accountable, but every aspect of society complicit in or contributing to harming children accountable as well. Every way in which children are harmed can be viewed through this broader analysis.

In Children’s Justice, I apply this critical consciousness specifically to the issue of infant genital cutting, better known as circumcision. Circumcision fits the legal definition of rape used by both the US Justice Department and FBI since circumcision involves the forcible penetration of a minor. The only reason circumcision is not viewed as pedophilia is that larger social systems including dominant cultural beliefs, medical institutions, and even the language used to talk about circumcision frame the practice as something other than harmful to normalize it.

The reason circumcision could be described as systemic pedophilia is that 1) cutting children’s genitals fits the legal definition of rape, 2) this rape is done to children, making it pedophilia, and 3) this pedophilia is carried out due to larger cultural systems, such as medical institutions or the beliefs people have around children, sexuality, or children’s bodies. It is pedophilia carried out by a system, hence the term systemic pedophilia.

The term systemic pedophilia applies to multiple forms of child abuse. What makes these forms of abuse systemic is that they are not merely carried out by individuals but through systems. Unlike individual acts of abuse, systemic pedophilia can continue even if an individual participant in these systems ceases their participation.

Ending systemic pedophilia will require holding not just individual abusers accountable, but transforming all systems complicit in the harm of children. It will mean changing beliefs, institutions, and language. It will require a social justice movement for the most vulnerable and historically oppressed minority in the world, children.


To learn more about systemic pedophilia, read my book Children’s Justice, available here: https://brendonmarotta.com/childrensjustice/

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Blog, Children's Justice

Follow My New Substack Hegemon Media

February 9, 2022 By Brendon Marotta

I’m now writing about Children’s Justice on my new substack Hegemon Media.

Substack is an online newsletter and publishing platform popular with journalists. If you subscribe, you will get short regular articles (2-3 per week) by me about Children’s Justice. While there is the possibility for a paid newsletter in the future, right now all substack writing is free.

I’m going to be putting out some powerful writing here. You’ll want to make sure you read every article by subscribing. Subscribe here.

You can also read my upcoming work by following me on Medium and by subscribing to this blog here.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Blog, Children's Justice

You Must Read The Book

February 8, 2022 By Brendon Marotta

The story of the bestseller that didn’t exist.

RSSiTunesSpotifyGoogle PodcastsStitcheriHeartRadioAmazon MusicPodcast AddictDeezerPodchaserPocketCastsPlayer.fmPodbeanListen NotesPodcast IndexOvercastCastroCastBoxPodfanYouTube

Plus, how to speak genius into reality through magick.

Resources

  • Video on I, Libertine: https://youtu.be/W7H5kFGEyUw
  • Children’s Justice
  • The Intactivist Guidebook

  • Subscribe and support the show directly:
    https://brendonmarotta.com/show/
  • Show RSS feed:
    https://brendonmarotta.com/showfeed/
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Blog, Children's Justice, Show

The New Hegemony

February 7, 2022 By Brendon Marotta

Human rights are dead.

We all know it, but no one wants to admit it. Rights like the right to travel, peacefully assemble, or decide what goes into your body are conditional on compliance with the medical overstate. Even rights still legally protected, like freedom of speech, are curtailed on all the platforms that matter under the guise of stopping “misinformation.”

The current regime has been unwilling to recognize protests based in human rights. When protestors claim that medical restrictions violate their rights, they are told by those currently in power that the dictates of the medical overstate are more important than their rights. Except in one case.

Protests based in social justice have been allowed to assemble in violation of previous medical guidelines. During the summer of 2020, at the height of COVID-19 lockdowns, there were mass protests across the United States that were publicly supported by medical officials. Virtually every major medical organization released a statement in support of social justice.

Why is this? Once the dominant ideology of the Western world, human rights based in liberalism has been replaced by a new hegemonic power: social justice based in critical theory. Critical social justice has power over every major cultural institution, including media, social media, corporations, universities, schools, churches, etc. giving it a cultural hegemony.

When Americans protest in the discourse of human rights, they might think they are appealing to the shared values of all Americans, but those in power do not share human rights values. If Americans wanted to speak to power in the language it recognizes, they would speak critical social justice.

Those in power have already shown they will cave if protests are done on the basis of social justice. Trying to get those in power to recognize the values they have abandoned would be going about change the hard way. The easier way would be to just base protests in the ideology those in power have already recognized supersedes their dictates, including medical institutions.

In my new book Children’s Justice, I frame it this way: Imagine you lived in Europe under the Catholic church of the Middle Ages. Would you make an argument based in human rights? Of course not. The church would never accept that. You would argue on the basis of Christianity.

The dominant power of modern times is not the church, but a different belief system. That system can be learned and applied to the issues that matter most. If applied, it might lead to change.


If you’d like to learn how I apply critical social justice, read my new book Children’s Justice here: https://brendonmarotta.com/childrensjustice/

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Blog, Children's Justice

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 29
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Follow

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • GitHub
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Medium
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube

Subscribe for more here:


Share

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Archives

  • June 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014

Copyright © 2022 · Brendon Marotta