• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Brendon Marotta

  • Work
  • Blog
  • Show
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Archives for May 2017

The Sundance Tell: How To Spot Amateur Filmmakers

May 31, 2017 By Brendon Marotta

I have a very simple tell for spotting amateur filmmakers. It’s if they say, “we’re going to premiere at Sundance.”

Not “we’ve gotten into the Sundance,” but “we’re going to premiere at Sundance.”

Sundance Film Festival gets 4000 feature film submissions a year. They accept 100-120. Many of the films they select are chosen before they even watch the open submissions, which means that if you submit blindly, your odds are actually even lower than that.

If you haven’t finished the film yet, and you’re already saying you’ll beat those odds, you’re either deluded or naive. Yet it’s surprising how many I’ve heard make this claim.

Also – why Sundance? Why not the Berlin, Venice, or Toronto International Film Festival? Why is Sundance important to your release strategy? There are niche film festivals for documentary, horror, LGBT films etc. Why not a festival for your niche, where the audience might be more receptive to your film? In fact, why do you even need a festival release at all? Why not limited theatrical or straight to DVD/VOD?

When amateur filmmakers say they’re going to premiere at Sundance what they are trying to communicate is that their film will be great, and making it into Sundance is the only symbol they have for conveying that, because it’s one of the few film festivals non-filmmakers know. However, the fact they don’t have any other symbol of success should tell you their level of experience.

This tactic sometimes works on non-filmmakers, because most people are very bad at visualizing what a final product will look like from work-in-progress. If you tell a non-filmmaker your brilliant release plan, expect their eyes to glaze over. If you tell them “we’re going to premiere at Sundance!” – hey, they have an image for that. It’s probably a misconception, but whatever – that image of Hollywood success will stick with them much more than any truthful plans.

The problem is that for the people who know film, they’ve just outed themselves as an amateur.

Read More: Empathy is The Ultimate Persuasion Tool

You might want to check out my movie, because we’re going to premiere at Sundance in your imagination.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Blog

Lake Of Fire (2006) – Movie Recommendation

May 29, 2017 By Brendon Marotta

If you’d like these movie recommendations delivered to your inbox, sign-up here.

Lake of Fire (2006) holds a special place in my mind because it was one of the documentaries I looked as a style reference when beginning my own film American Circumcision. It is impossible for me to talk about this film without talking about the lessons I look from it.

Lake of Fire is a two and a half hour documentary on the abortion debate shot over fourteen years on 35mm black and white film. If that sounds fascinating to you, you’ll probably like this film. If it sounds heavy – yes, very much so. But the above description should be enough for you to know if this film is right for you.

I’ve shown Lake of Fire to friends on both sides of the abortion debate, and they’ve all said they found it fair and interesting. That is an incredible accomplishment, that comes from the documentaries willingness to let its interview subjects talk and share a complete thought with nuance. Given the amount of footage they had for this film, it must have taken incredible discipline in the editing room to keep those long ideas, and not hack them down to a soundbite.

That willingness to let interview subjects on both sides speak is the biggest thing I took from this film for my own. So much of the abortion debate – maybe even all public debate – has devolved into people screaming at each other. This film listens. Even when we see scenes of protestors screaming at counter protestors, the camera just watches, giving us the distance to process what we’re seeing.

The second takeaway I took was interviewing a range of perspectives. Lake of Fire share perspectives from fundamentalists, feminists, academics, performance artists, people who do abortions, women who’ve had abortions, and even the Roe of Roe v. Wade herself. That range of perspectives is part of what keeps the film feeling fair.

There are certain moments you could only catch by shooting for that long a time. For example, one man in a man on the street interview goes on to bomb an abortion clinic. His interview is fascinating, because it reveals the seeds of a mindset that will lead to an awful crime. While there’s no way to plan or predict a moment like that, if you shoot for hundreds of hours you’re bound to catch lightning at some point.

This brings me to the third takeaway. This is a heavy film. People die. A woman talks about how the last three abortion doctors she worked for have all been killed. Subjects cry on camera. They face life changing decisions. But the camera allows us the distance needed to process it all. Even the choice to make the film black and white puts old images we’ve seen before in a new context.

With so many bound to enter the film with preconceived ideas, these stylistic choices allow us to see what the film presents as new. Even the music, which features an almost heavenly choir, gives that little bit of perspective needed to pull the documentary from the level of news and politics to the level of art.

You’ll notice I haven’t said much about the film’s politics. With a regular documentary that might be the focus. Here, it’s almost secondary. The film isn’t really interested in pushing an agenda – just listening. Even though many of the specific political events it covers are no longer relevant, the film still is, because human emotion and listening to peoples experiences will always be relevant.

If you feel like listening to peoples thoughts and feelings around this issue is worth your time, this film is a good recommendation. If that sounds too heavy to you, or you don’t have the space to process it, pass.

  • Watch Lake Of Fire (2006)

If you’d like more of these film recommendations, sign-up for my email list here:



Previous Movie Recommendation: Dark Days (2000)

P.S. Check out the film I’m working on here, because it’s been influenced by a lot of great films.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Movie Recommendations

Empathy is the Ultimate Persuasion Tool

May 23, 2017 By Brendon Marotta

In the past two years, I’ve become deeply interested in persuasion for one simple reason – I used to suck at it.

Don’t let the recent success of raising over $90,000 on Kickstarter, having the trailer for my film go viral with over 400,000 views in a week, or the fact persuasion guru Scott Adams linked me fool you. Most of my life has been spent autistically explaining things to people, and then having them yell at me because they got triggered.

Since writing about persuasion, I’ve had people repeatedly ask me for advice about the topic. All the advice I could give them would really come down to one word. It’s the thing I didn’t realize when I was younger, and possibly the hardest thing for any human being to work on.

Empathy.

Empathy is the ultimate persuasion tool.

To be clear – empathy is the ability to understand what another person is thinking, feeling, and experiencing.

In order to persuade someone, you first have have to know where they are. You can’t lead someone to a new place, if you don’t know where they’re starting. If I say “you should join me, because of our shared identity as Italians” – and you aren’t Italian – the argument will fall on deaf ears. However, if your Italian heritage is deeply important to your identity, then that argument might be very persuasive.

Many of the arguments I used to make and the arguments I see others make come from assuming the other person is like you, shares your unique ideas, feelings, and experiences, and will react to new information the same way you do, rather then respecting their unique perspective and starting point.

Understanding People’s Pain

There’s a story about two skeptics who attended a new age healing workshop. They found the workshop ridiculous and unscientific. When the workshop organizers took questions, one attendee asked if the healing process they were selling would cure insomnia. They said it would. Another asked if it would help him stay awake longer. They said it would. The skeptics stood up and pointed out that it was impossible for the same process to help someone both stay awake and fall asleep. They proceeded to debunk the organizers’ claims.

At the end of the seminar, there were twice as many sign-ups as usual.

When the skeptics questioned attendees – why did you sign up when we debunked everything? – they learned the attendees had real problems. One was in physical pain from his inability to sleep. He didn’t want to be talked out of something that might treat his problem. While the skeptics arguments were valid, those arguments wouldn’t solve their problems. The healing method might. This was not a philosophical exercise for the attendees. They were in real pain.

In other words – while their argument was sound, the skeptics hadn’t empathized with the people they were speaking to.

Sort Yourself Out

When I first sought persuasion advice, it came from a place of manipulation. “How do I get this other person to do what I want?” And based on the questions I’ve gotten, I suspect I’m not the only one who’s thought this way.

This comes from a valid place. We all have a need to be seen and heard. When our needs aren’t met, we look for ways to fulfill them. The idea that there’s a secret formula by which you can get people to do what you want is very appealing, especially if you have unmet needs. Ironically, this selfish attitude is the opposite of what works in persuasion. The real question to ask isn’t “how do I get what I want” but “what does the other person want and need – and is there a way I can get both our needs met?”

But how can you focus on others needs when yours are still crying out unmet?

There – you’re going to have to empathize with your own unmet needs. You’re going to have to do the inner work of deeply listening to them and meeting them from within. If this sounds like therapy, yes, that’s one form it could take. It’s had a different names over the years. Inner work. Spirituality. Sorting yourself out. But if you do it, you’ll be practicing the skill of empathy, whether you know it or not.

If you practice empathy with yourself, you can practice it with others.

Empathy Will Cost You Your Pride

I suspect more people don’t open themselves up to empathy because empathy goes both ways.

The moment you really understand someone else’s perspective, you might realize it’s valid. You might realize that your simple narratives about them aren’t true. You may or may not change their perspective, but yours will definitely shift.

For one of the best examples of this I know, check out this talk by Cassie Jaye, the director of The Red Pill.

Empathy will cost you your pride.

Pride is the belief that you’re better than others because reasons. It’s a feeling or belief of superiority.

How many YouTube videos, articles, and even “news” stories can be boiled down to, “look at this person I’m better than!” Look at that SJW. That racist. That feminist. That Trump supporter. That loser. Isn’t it nice to feel better than that person? Mmmmm… Pride.

Some of you won’t be able to let go of that. That’s okay. Just know that you won’t be as effective a persuader, and most of the time you’ll be responding to your idea of a person, rather than who they actually are.

Empathy Plus Technique

Once you have empathy, all other persuasion techniques will work. NLP, hypnosis, Robert Cialdini’s work, marketing techniques – all of it. But you won’t be able to pace and lead your audience till you know where they are.

So start with empathy. Start with really trying to understand the thoughts, feelings, and experiences of other people. And if you’re not ready to do that yet, practice empathy with your own unmet needs.

Read More: How To Recommend Movies

P.S. You might be interested in my documentary, because you want to be an empathic person.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Blog

Dark Days (2000) – Movie Recommendation

May 22, 2017 By Brendon Marotta

This is the first of an upcoming movie recommendation series. If you’d like these recommendations delivered to your email on a regular basis, sign-up here.

Dark Days (2000) is a powerful film, made even more powerful by the story behind it.

Often great filmmaking is the result of “happy accidents” – moments where the conditions come together to create something you couldn’t have planned. Dark Days is the result of nearly a decade of happy accidents. It is the rare case where a filmmaker with zero filmmaking experience managed to pick up a camera and create something that is not only beautiful, but actually accomplished the intended social change – getting housing for it’s subjects – the homeless people living in the tunnels underneath New York city.

The cinematography is gorgeous. A friend of director Marc Singer told him, “if you shoot color and you don’t know what you’re doing, you’ll fuck it all up and it will come out looking all green or red.” 16mm b&w is the cheapest film stock there is. The director knew films had moving shots and wanted some for his film – so he built a dolly rig that could glide along the tunnel tracks underground. The result is long beautiful black and white shots drifting through the darkness of the tunnels. They shot film for years before having the money to develop it, fingers-crossed that it would actually come out good. How many happy accidents is that for just the cinematography alone?

Because the director lived underground with his interview subjects – how’s that for commitment? – they are completely at home around him. We are a fly on the wall for a world most of us will never experience. It doesn’t patronize or look down on the homeless. It humanizes them. We feel for them, and feel with them by the end when they finally find housing.

Speaking of feeling, Dark Days is known for it’s music by DJ Shadow. In another happy accident, the filmmakers were able to license his music. Shadow is known for being protective of his music rights. In interviews, he said he sat down to watch the film expecting to say no, and then being blown away by the film. He not only gave them music rights, but remixed his work for them and composed an original theme. So those hypnotic black and white images are accompanied by moody instrumental hip-hop beats.

What inspires me about Dark Days is that it’s a testament to what you can create by just moving forward with what you have. At every stage it seems like the director just thought “films have moving shots… We need moving shots… Somehow we’ll be do that… We need this music… Somehow we’ll get it… We can’t afford film stock… Somehow we’ll get it.” This attitude of just moving forward and knowing you’ll find a way has definitely informed my own filmmaking process.

If you’re looking to be inspired by the journey out of a dark place, this is a good film to see.

  • Watch Dark Days (2000)

If you’d like more of these film recommendations, sign-up for my email list here:



Read More: How To Recommend Movies

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Movie Recommendations

How To Recommend Movies

May 14, 2017 By Brendon Marotta

Recommending movies is a bit like recommending lovers – you have to know the person you’re recommending for to give them a good suggestion.

90% of the time someone says “you have to see that movie!” I have zero interest. This is because when most people recommend a film, they are recommending the film based on the experience it gave them, not the experience it will give you.

We all process the world differently. Two can people can watch the same film and have different experiences. They might also be looking different experiences. Whether or not you’ll like a film often depends more on you and what you’re looking for, then the film itself.

For example, the film Requiem for Dream (2000) is an undeniably powerful film. However, it is a brutal work of art about addiction that pushes the artform of editing to a style that borders on experimental. The ending is absolutely devastating and most people I know cry – heck, sob uncontrollably – at climax of the film. If you want to experience what is possible with cinema, or feel a deep sense of sadness and release, this is your film. If you’re on a first date, or looking for a fun night in with the family, not so much.

When recommending a film, you have to consider two:

  • How does the person I’m suggesting a film for process the world?
  • What sort of experience is this person looking to have?

Films are a bit like hypnosis – imaginary events that produce real results. While the film may be fake, your feelings about it and experience of it is real. Studies have shown that if a character you identify with wins, you experience that win as if it was your own, even on a biological level, with testosterone levels rising as a result.

So if films change us, the real question is – how would you like to change? What would you like to experience?

Since I’m considering starting a weekly movie recommendation series, my goal isn’t just to note the usual stuff – the cinematography, the acting, the editing, the blah blah blah – but the experience you might have from a film. Of course, everyone processes the world differently, so if I suspect different types may react differently to a film, I’ll note that.

Often a persons reaction to a film says more about them then the film itself. For example, the first time I saw Taxi Driver (1976), I didn’t like it. Taxi Driver is a film about loneliness, and at the time I saw it, I felt lonely. I didn’t want to confront those feelings, so to have them reflected back to me was difficult. However, upon reflection, the film helped me deal with those feelings. Now it’s one of my favorites, in part because it helped reveal something to me that I didn’t know I was feeling. The art allowed me to go deeper into myself.

Films can also allow us to understand each other on a deeper level. When someone recommends a film, they often do so because they want you to understand an experience they had. In understanding that experience, you better understand something about them. (Sometimes people even make films because they want you to understand their experience of the experience of others, but that’s a different story.)

Most film reviewers pretend movies as if they are objective critics, but we do not experience film – or anything – objectively. We experience it from our perspective. And wanting someone to understand your perspective is a totally valid reason to recommend a film. If film can further intimacy and understanding, great. I fully admit that some of the films I’ll write about will be because I want to expose people to new perspective.

That said – what experiences are you looking to have? Let me know – @bdmarotta on all social media.

P.S. If you know someone who is having a baby or might have one, you might want to recommend they get on the email list for my upcoming documentary.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Blog

How Tech Will End Our Shared Reality

May 1, 2017 By Brendon Marotta

Media will be able to fake anything once two technologies become mainstream – Face2Face and Adobe VoCo.

Face2Face lets you replace the facial movements of a real public figure in real time. Watch video of it in action here:

Adobe VoCo is photoshop for voice. It lets you create audio of a public figure saying any quote you want in their voice. Watch a video about it here, it’s magic:

With the combination of these two technologies you will be able to make a convincing video of any public figure saying or doing anything you want. Anything.

As a filmmaker this excites me. I could have real public figures interact with the characters in my movie. Cool. But this tech won’t just be limited to clearly fictional films. This will appear on twitter. This will appear in memes. This will create the greatest era of fake news the world has ever seen.

It used to be the only news you could trust was that you saw with your own eyes. Yes, there were newspapers, but they were known to be highly partisan and full of lies. Then recording came along and everyone could see what happened. “Let’s check the tape.”

I believe we are going to go back to an era where all you can trust is what you’ve seen and experienced firsthand. Where video of something happening is only as reliable as the hearsay of someone telling you they saw something once.

People already complain that those with difference ideologies are living in their own realities. When this tech goes mainstream, we really will create our own reality. Which reality is true? You choose.

More articles on this:

  • New Digital Face Manipulation Means You Can’t Trust Video Anymore
  • Welcome to the New Era of Easy Media Manipulation
  • Real or Fake? AI Is Making It Very Hard to Know

P.S. If you want a taste of what might happen, just ask yourself one question – how would 4chan use this technology?

Read more: The Real Reason For 8k Cameras

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed Under: Blog

Primary Sidebar

Follow

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • GitHub
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Medium
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube

Subscribe for more here:


Share

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Archives

  • November 2022
  • June 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014

Copyright © 2023 · Brendon Marotta